| Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
| Online Users |
There are currently 914 online users. » 0 Member(s) | 910 Guest(s) Applebot, Baidu, Bing, Google
|
|
|
| MX Linux 21 vs Linux Lite 6.0: My thougts so far |
|
Posted by: Ralph Bromley - 06-04-2022, 06:50 PM - Forum: Suggestions and Feedback
- Replies (3)
|
 |
So recently I replaced MX Linux 21 with Linux Lite on my aging 2013 era laptop and I have some thoughts I wish to share.
Note this is not really "what one is better" thread as both Linux flavors have their pros and cons but still I think comparing the two is more than fair as both have the same goal in mind: being overall user-friendly for Linux newcomers and lightweight for older machines.
With that in mind here are my thoughts on Linux lite so far:
The Good:
Overall, I feel Linux lite is a bit faster and smoother than MX linux 21 on this machine, I have had some snares on MX Linux 21 making it feel a bit sluggish and unresponsive.
I installed both on a SSD with BTRFS as the main file system with ext4 for my /home partition on a hard drive with swap alongside it (I have a caddy that converted a DVD drive into a hard drive bay)
Now it's not faster by much but on this ol gal I will take every advantage I can, the fact that it runs so well means Linux Lite is likely to stay for the long haul or at least until the next version of MX.
The Bad:
The update indicator sucks in Linux lite, It's always there and never goes away.
Plus the indicator does nothing, why can't I install updates via the indicator? After getting used to getting updates via the indicator icon, this feels so archaic and out of place.
Plus it doesn't hide itself, I used so many flavors of Linux that change the icon of the update notifier, so I know what to expect... but here?
Nope.
I used MX, Mint, even arch using pamac notifications, this indicator is next to useless.
The Ugly:
The way I have to install Firefox, honestly I know why Linux lite ditched Firefox thanks to it now being a snap, but it's in a PPA now, I think Linux lite should enable the PPA by default in the next revision.
I know this was beyond Linux lite's control but still it annoys the crap out of me, I hope there is a better way to do it in the future without so much hoop jumping.
Anyhow, with that said Linux lite so far seems to be a good distro for this machine, I am still having a few issues but will bring those up later when I have the time.
My goal was to evaluate first, then do problem-solving later.
|
|
|
| how to add programs to menu Quick Launch |
|
Posted by: Henerey8 - 06-03-2022, 09:37 PM - Forum: Other
- Replies (4)
|
 |
I've been through the Help and the Control Panels but I cannot find a way to Add Firefox and Thunderbird to the quick launch start menu, or for that matter to remove Chrome from it (choosing Remove from the right click popup is doing nothing for me). This would be useful to know for other applications too.
|
|
|
| clamav virus scan |
|
Posted by: vint - 06-03-2022, 04:13 PM - Forum: Security & Bug Fixes
- Replies (1)
|
 |
I have a question about the clamav virus scan length of time it takes for a scan to complete.
I followed the command line in the tutorial to scan just the home folder, since there isn't much in the home folder pictures and a few downloads why is it taking so long?
Is there a way to see the scan and the time remaining?
Vint,
God Bless Texas
|
|
|
| Cannot Install 6.0 in Virtualbox |
|
Posted by: enigma9o7 - 06-03-2022, 04:31 AM - Forum: Installing Linux Lite
- Replies (1)
|
 |
Not sure why. I've installed other distros succesfully.
I get the grub menu, and have tried all options. All just end up eventually hanging with black screen....
I also tried enabling EUFI boot to see if any different, but no.
Virtualbox Version 6.1.34. I imagine this post isn't very useful, I came here looking for info expecting to not be the first with this problem....
|
|
|
|