| Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
| Online Users |
There are currently 1022 online users. » 0 Member(s) | 1019 Guest(s) Baidu, Bing, Google
|
| Latest Threads |
Project Litening
Forum: Linux Lite Software Development
Last Post: SleepyD
04-12-2026, 05:18 PM
» Replies: 12
» Views: 1,009
|
Website forum links not w...
Forum: Suggestions and Feedback
Last Post: valtam
04-06-2026, 12:32 AM
» Replies: 5
» Views: 341
|
time synchronization
Forum: Other
Last Post: LL-user
04-03-2026, 03:13 PM
» Replies: 5
» Views: 1,579
|
Permissions on a secondar...
Forum: Other
Last Post: stevef
04-02-2026, 06:26 AM
» Replies: 9
» Views: 596
|
Some windows fail to rend...
Forum: Video Cards
Last Post: Crimson Plasma
03-31-2026, 04:19 PM
» Replies: 4
» Views: 384
|
Linux Lite 7.8 Final Rele...
Forum: Release Announcements
Last Post: Wirezfree
03-29-2026, 10:21 PM
» Replies: 16
» Views: 29,042
|
Accidentally Deleted fold...
Forum: Hard Drives and SSDs
Last Post: trinidad
03-13-2026, 11:38 PM
» Replies: 3
» Views: 337
|
Linux lite 6.0 doesn't wo...
Forum: Installing Linux Lite
Last Post: Dottor Octopus
03-03-2026, 05:14 PM
» Replies: 10
» Views: 1,316
|
xfce-panel fuzzy clock
Forum: Installing Software
Last Post: valtam
02-28-2026, 02:38 AM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 330
|
Unable to Mount External ...
Forum: Hard Drives and SSDs
Last Post: sqwuade
02-22-2026, 08:39 AM
» Replies: 7
» Views: 42,051
|
|
|
| USB Persistence for LL v6.0 |
|
Posted by: Francois - 08-10-2022, 11:11 PM - Forum: Installing Linux Lite
- Replies (9)
|
 |
Greetings, Jerry & all!
I've recently installed a persistent Linux Lite v6.0 on a USB 2.0 thumb drive recently, using this tutorial. I had v5.8 on it before and it worked great! But with v6.0... it appears to be much, much slower, to the point of not being really usable. I then tried it again with a USB 3.0 drive, and I cannot see much of an improvement on this 10th gen i5 laptop: - a solid 15 minutes boot time
- prompts for unresponsive applications when all I did was click the X to close them
- ~1h15 to download ~800 MB of updates on a 40 MBps connection, and 16% install progress after another hour
My thoughts are currently:- Was there a change from version 5 to 6 that could explain such a difference?
- There's new options when using mkusb since the tutorial was made. Could one of them make the USB drive slower for a persistence purpose?
- Am I doing something wrong or having unrealistic expectations?
I tested my USB thumb drive before using mkusb on it. On my desktop Linux Lite v6.0 installation, it took about 10 seconds to copy 1 GB of files to the FAT32 system that was on it then. Also, the laptop's USB port I'm using has 'SS' right next to it.
Any help would be very welcome! Thank you for reading and please have a nice day.
|
|
|
| Timeshift auf USB Stick erstellen |
|
Posted by: Ralf - 08-07-2022, 08:35 AM - Forum: Other
- Replies (3)
|
 |
Hello, I need your help.
I installed Linix Lite 6.0 and got everything working so far.
Now I want to make a system backup in case the system fails.
Is that possible with timeshift or do I need a complete backup of my partition?
Many Thanks.
Google Translate
|
|
|
| Hard drive will not mount |
|
Posted by: csias40 - 08-06-2022, 01:51 AM - Forum: Hard Drives and SSDs
- Replies (4)
|
 |
Got this answer... on 2 computers:
Error mounting /dev/sdb2 at /media/tina/TOSHIBA EXT 4TB new: Command-line `mount -t "ntfs" -o "uhelper=udisks2,nodev,nosuid,uid=1000,gid=1000" "/dev/sdb2" "/media/tina/TOSHIBA EXT 4TB new"' exited with non-zero exit status 13: $MFTMirr does not match $MFT (record 0).
Failed to mount '/dev/sdb2': Input/output error
NTFS is either inconsistent, or there is a hardware fault, or it's a
SoftRAID/FakeRAID hardware. In the first case run chkdsk /f on Windows
then reboot into Windows twice. The usage of the /f parameter is very
important! If the device is a SoftRAID/FakeRAID then first activate
it and mount a different device under the /dev/mapper/ directory, (e.g.
/dev/mapper/nvidia_eahaabcc1). Please see the 'dmraid' documentation
for more details.
Is this fixable? Someone unplugged it while copying files....Tried it on two different Linuc Lite computers.
If you have an answer, please tell me what to copy paste into the terminal because I am limited in my understanding.
|
|
|
| ubuntu-support-status (command) |
|
Posted by: Rosika - 08-05-2022, 02:04 PM - Forum: On Topic
- Replies (10)
|
 |
Hi all, 
before downloading and installing Linux Lite 6.0 I wanted to run some tests on it making use of distrotest (https://distrotest.net/Linux%20Lite ).
Basically that went well but there´s one thing I don´t quite understand:
When running the command Code: ubuntu-support-status
I got the following answer:
Code: 2117 packages installed
0 receive package updates with LTS until 4/2027
[...]
I realize distrotest doesn´t have internet connection enabled but that shouldn´t have anything to do with it ...
... as I ran a distrotest instance for Lubuntu 22.04 as well - for the sake of comparison (https://distrotest.net/Lubuntu ).
The same conditions applied here but I got the following output:
Code: 1759 packages installed
1272 receive package updates with LTS until 4/2027
[...]
Does anyone have any ideas why the command "ubuntu-support-status" doesn´t seem to work (correctly) with Linux Lite? :022:
Is it the same when using an installed OS?
Thanks a lot for your help in advance.
Many greetings
Rosika :wave
BTW:
I made screenshots but I don´t seem to be able (or allowed) to upload them.
|
|
|
|